
The more people hate Twitter, the more we should tweet.
And blog, and Facebook and YouTube... This free-flowing river of information is threatening to tyrants -- and truly annoying to reasonable people, as well. The real-time Web is also a new voice of liberty, dissent, self-expression and, yes, our right to be annoying.
The strange motivation behind Thursday's attacks on LiveJournal, Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, and apparently even Google makes clear that these social media sites are powerful sites of expression. Tyrants and oppressors hate that. Good.
Facebook is now confirming what a Web traffic-tracking expert told The New York Times yesterday: That these attacks were aimed at one political blogger. Russian groups tried to take down the social media world to silence the critic who uses the name Cyxymu online.
He has actually criticized both sides in the Russia-Georgia conflict, and his tweets are pedestrian and tame. His LiveJournal account, however, has been seen as a news hub for Russian critics. And the cyber attackers might have been simply showing the world that they can do this kind of thing. For excellent detail on all of this click here.
I don't know if he supports good causes or not, whether he says great or terrible things, and I don't have any opinion about that conflict. But Cyxymu, you have a powerful voice, and it deserves to be heard. I don't know you, or how to pronounce that tangle of alphabet that is your name. But this tweet's for you. Follow him here. (President Obama now does.)
That makes the great social media meltdown, which lasted all of two hours, with lingering effects, stunning, bizarre and important.
That these attacks were able to have significant success against Twitter is troubling and points out significant security vulnerabilities. But this also points out the power of political dissent these sites now carry. Twitter's role in the Iranian election dissent has been clear. (To see what Time magazine says about that, click here.) Apparently repressive powers elsewhere now fear social media enough to launch intense efforts to squelch it.
In other words, this was no joke -- and neither is social media. The pop culture obsession with Twitter and Facebook, and the resulting backlash, are only part of the story. I have written that Twitter and Facebook are "annoying fads." They are -- in one aspect. The current craze will not last, and it is as irritating as any pop culture trend, maybe moreso. I have also written in the same breath that "they are pioneering, hugely influential portals into another era. Before our eyes they are leading to new and better forms of social dialogue. And the impact they are having on how we relate to one another is nothing short of revolutionary. Pay attention: This is the biggest change in communications -- in freedom of speech -- since desktop publishing."
Thursday was further proof of that. Conan O'Brien viciously mocked the Twitter shutdown last night, parodying Twitter as carrying only nonsense about what Ashton Kutcher eats for lunch. How's it feel to be really wrong, Conan? Anytime oppressors are shutting down voices of dissent, something important is going on.

Conan is not wrong, and Twitter is extremely annoying. So are Facebook status' that explain every mundane detail of the person's day, "I am in the checkout line at the grocery store"
ReplyDeletedude, get a grip, it ain't all that.
ReplyDeleteThis is a contemptuous story full of lies. Conan was right. That's exactly what twitter is. More than anything, it's a violation of privacy. People need to understand how this is destroying our society. It's all too obvious that the writer of this piece also acts like a 12 year old ashton kutcher and wants to be in everyone's bedroom.
ReplyDeletePeople all over are using the twitter and facebook and myspace to rendezvous for gay sex and the like. May God have mercy on the teenagers who started these vile websites. Only a coward living under these addictions would come to their defense by saying that there is no harm being done. Keep your business to yourself and keep out of others business. From the way the world is going down the commode, people should get off the computer and take care of their life, AND their sadistic addictions fueled by these trashy website creations.
ReplyDeleteFirst off, Conan O'Brian is a bit of a stooge when it comes to most really important things; he seems to typify the stereotype of Gen-X...to the regret of most Gen-Xers, who are much more conscious of the world outside themselves than he (or his writers) seems to be. I think there's a self-absorption behind those eyes and under that hair that's his own 'blond moment.'
ReplyDeleteThat said, I'm also not sure that you should be so hard on the current fad of Twitter... Yes, it's the rage at present. But it does a lot of wonderful things: namely, it allows me to both learn about and provide new information in a manner that's much more efficient than any other of recent memory.
140 Characters (incl. a link if need be) is low resource-intensity, high absorption media at its best. Neither I nor my friends need wade through the sea of non-important text or ads to get to the information we want to see. I can 'push' information to people predisposed to its' importance...a ready-made market.
Frankly, I see Twitter technology being more well-suited for business and local government use than its originally-intended purpose could ever have been. To that end, it's only going to be more popular as Boomers age out of the workplace and into retirement, still needing to stay in touch (and have information provided to them) without the desktops they've grown accustomed to.
So, Conan--wish he was just a faded fad, rather than a contractually-obligated media mouthpiece. Twitter, much more valuable than many give it credit for...including for the political dialogue use you've highlighted in this post. Thanks for the opportunity to speak truth to power (or something like that)!
Oh for the love of God. Aren't reporters, even pseudo-columnist reporters, supposed to pretend impartiality sometimes, or explore other viewpoints for the sake of analysis? Jeff Elder thinks social networking is the same as the Beatles. GOT IT. And that's fine. But can he write about something else ever? This reads like a 12-year-old boy's daily diary on reasons why Star Wars is the best movie ever. Monday: I love Star Wars. Tuesday: Star Wars is so cool. Wednesday: Luke is better than Darth Vader. Thursday ....
ReplyDeleteNot much conversation going on here... what's the point of this story. I read all of this very early this morning.
ReplyDeleteFirst off, if anything that you don't personally HAVE to do annoys you, you are letting other people/fads/issues take up WAY too much space in your head. Last time I checked, Twitter, and Facebook, and all the other networking sites were MEMBERSHIP, and password protected. How does this annoy all you non-twitterers and non-Facebookers? Should it annoy you if I report everytime I pass gas? If it does, don't follow me or be taking up the bandwidth on my page. Way too many people in our society insist on commenting on things/people/issues that DON'T affect them at all. Mind your own business folks.
ReplyDeleteI still can't get on Twitter. Are they still having problems?
ReplyDeleteJeff, clearly you are not old enough to remember this thing called "IRC" which is a worldwide chat network that existed since the late 1980s.
ReplyDeleteTwitter is simple IRC. Each user automatically creates their own room, and anyone who "follows" them simply joins that room.
Twitter even uses the same symbols that IRC does, like "@" and "#"
But like I said, since you've never even heard of IRC I doubt this message makes any sense to you,
I'm glad I'm not the only one that thought Jeff sounded whiny and defensive.
ReplyDeleteOne also has to note that if Twitter and Facebook are down or just a fad, then Jeff is out of a job.
Social media give a voice to the voiceless. A platform to be heard. Regardless if we agree with what is being said.
ReplyDeleteto each his own...some of the comments here are so blah blah blah.
ReplyDeleteif you don't tweet - fine. but disregarding something that you have no working knowledge continues to prove on of the tenets of communication - competency.
whether you like it, love it, use it or could give a crap - it is a part of the landscape of the world and folks have been pioneering some great things with it.
I guess you all will freak out when you read that (GASP) you can get a PhD in Culture, Media and Technology studies in your beloved state of NC.
cursed!
(quote)Jeff Elder thinks social networking is the same as the Beatles. GOT IT. And that's fine. But can he write about something else ever?(QUOTE)
ReplyDeleteDuh ... social networking is his beat. He's SUPPOSED to write primarily about that. If city government were his beat, he's write about that. And he's a columnist, not a reporter, so he is allowed to have opinions as long as it is clear they are his opinions.
Mr. Elder wrote: "Twitter's role in the Iranian election dissent has been clear."
ReplyDeleteAnd its clear that it had much less effect than Mr.Elder continues to claim.
From NPR:
"Ethan Zuckerman, a Harvard University expert on the use of technology in the developing world, says don't believe the hype about how much social media is driving events in Iran.
Zuckerman: We've been talking to people in Iran. We've been talking to people in the Iranian blogging community. We think the protests are much more organized by traditional media, by people calling each other on mobile phones or sending text messages back and forth."
NPR sums it up:
"Why is Twitter getting all the attention? For one thing, Twitter has become the social media darling of journalists. Between its utility as an information-gathering tool and the exuberance resulting from celebrities embracing Twitter, it's become a pop culture phenomenon that is hard for them to ignore.
Now combine that journalistic enthusiasm toward Twitter with the Iran protest story, and it's hard to resist covering it as something momentous. But how do you reconcile this pronouncement with the fact that only a small number of protesters are actively using Twitter?"
So Mr. Elder, keep up your promotion of a company that does not pay your salary and living in your echo chamber. I'll be curious to see if your job or Twitter's popularity disappears first.
http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2009/06/twitter_social_media_role_in_i.html
This is one of the lamest blogs I've ever read. Of all the technological innovations around, the Observer things social networking is 'cutting edge'???
ReplyDelete'Net fads come and go... unfortunately, there are a lot of media-based stooges (sorry Jeff) that hype up a product that should have died long ago. Or never seen the light of day. Ashton Kutchner? Why is he even relavant? Ditto for Conan...
Keep your business to yourself and keep out of others business. From the way the world is going down the commode, people should get off the computer and take care of their life, AND their sadistic addictions fueled by these trashy website creations.
ReplyDeleteMore lies. This is not a social networking site like those other pieces of blasphemous garbage. Only someone like you who promotes lives being ruined through gay sex would come to it's defense and try to say a site of the Charlotte Observer's even compares. What a sick and tragic mind. Remember, "God didn't corrupt the mind.....the Devil took the mind" - Prophetess Hardaway, Raeford NC. Hopefully you will stop the lies and go out and meet real people instead of living this lie.
ReplyDelete